![]() |
|
DataNucleus Forum » List all forums » » Forum: General Development » » » Thread: AbstractMethodError on simple persistence on beta-5 » » » » Post: AbstractMethodError on simple persistence on beta-5 |
Print at Mar 15, 2010 2:36:05 PM |
| Posted by alex_saint_croix at Apr 19, 2006 9:49:03 PM |
|
0
AbstractMethodError on simple persistence on beta-5 Hello, I'm getting a strange error. I've recently upgraded from beta-3 to beta-5, and this code used to work perfectly. Now it does not. I've walked through the code in the AbstractPersistenceManagerImpl, looking for the cause of the problem, but I'm not able to find it. Here's the stack trace: Testcase: testIPM(org.eremite.triune.hypernym.IdeaTest): Caused an ERROR org.jpox.PersistenceManagerImpl.makePersistent(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object; java.lang.AbstractMethodError: org.jpox.PersistenceManagerImpl.makePersistent(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object; at org.eremite.triune.hypernym.IdeaTest.testIPM(IdeaTest.java:107) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) Any ideas? More information about this at http://blog.lib.umn.edu/nalex/blog/2005/12/abstractmethoderror_orgjpoxper.html & http://blog.lib.umn.edu/nalex/blog/2005/12/au...11_bidirectio_1.html#more These pages furnish complete stack traces from the problems in question. I was hoping that an upgrade to beta-5 would resolve the missing feature roadblock I ran into. It wasn't tough to build a beta-5 maven plugin, once I upgraded to the latest jdo-2.0 snapshot jar. I'd be happy to give that plugin back to the world, btw. I know I'm shooting for a moving target, but I've definitely missed something that isn't documented yet. Something that changed between beta-3 and beta-5. Any help would be appreciated, -- Alexander Saint Croix --------------------------------------- This post has been recovered after a database corruption and might completely or partially lack replies. This thread had 3 replies before corruption. |
|
|
Current timezone is GMT Mar 15, 2010 2:36:05 PM |