![]() |
![]() |
|
| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Online | User List | Help |
|
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 13
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Expert UK Joined: Mar 13, 2004 Post Count: 5376 Status: Offline |
After 20 months of blood, sweat, tears, insults and politics, we're pleased to announce the release of JPOX 1.1.0, aka JDO2 "Reference Implementation". This is a fully-compliant implementation of the JDO2 (JSR243) specification passing the JDO2 TCK. JDO2 provides a major improvement over JDO1 providing standardised O/R mapping, major JDOQL query enhancements, lifecycle listeners, attach/detach, fetch-group control, SQL querying, and much much more. Please refer to JPOX JIRA for full details of the changes during the 1.1.0 release cycle. This is to provide yet more evidence that JDO is not "going away" unlike what certain (database-oriented) companies would like you to think. You can download this release of JPOX from our SourceForge site, or from the Maven repository (hosted on Nightlabs, but mirrored at intervals by IBiblio). For details of JDO2 and the TCK please refer to the Apache JDO project Thanks to all of those who have contributed to JPOX in the last 2 years with positive comments, contributions, patches, donations and particularly to Nightlabs for their continued hosting and support. ---------------------------------------- -Andy ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Novice Joined: Feb 3, 2006 Post Count: 34 Status: Offline |
Great! Thanks for your efforts and for the great product. |
||
|
|
Newbie Joined: Sep 8, 2005 Post Count: 17 Status: Offline |
/cheer ![]() |
||
|
|
Member Germany Joined: Nov 28, 2004 Post Count: 90 Status: Offline |
Congratulations to the JPOX Team. You've all done a great and very valuable job, thanks ... ![]() ---------------------------------------- Regards Alex jfire: free erp, crm, scm and more |
||
|
|
Expert Australia Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Post Count: 562 Status: Offline |
Excellent work! You've done very well and produced a quality engineered product that implements a leading edge, well thought out and well designed architecture/specification: JDO2. You are very responsive to any questions or issues we have had and I have great confidence in JPOX. Next week we are going 'live' with a large enterprise application consisting of well over 100 classes - all transparently persisted using JPOX! That's well over 100 POJO (Plain Old Java Objects) classes that were persisted without us writing any extra code to make them 'persistable'. We were able to use the full power of the Java language without the restrictions or constraints imposed by most other non JDO solutions. This meant we could forge ahead with model driven POJO development in a highly productive manner.Thank you once again! ![]() ---------------------------------------- Chris Colman http://visualclassworks.com Javelin: Visual modeling & coding with automatic JDO 2/DataNucleus meta data generation. http://expojo.com expojo: Simple dependency injection and exposed POJO domain model pattern |
||
|
|
Member Belgium Joined: Jun 24, 2004 Post Count: 81 Status: Offline |
Congrats Erik & Andy. :-) Enjoy the credits, there's so deserved! & I think I speak for all JPOX users when I want to thank you guys specifically for the solid support you guys give. Quick, with a touch of humor, efficient, patient. :-) Any dreams for what's coming next? (XML persistence integration, I see JPA compliance on the main page) All the best! Philippe |
||
|
|
Advanced Member Switzerland Joined: Dec 20, 2004 Post Count: 102 Status: Offline |
Congratulations Andy & Erik...and thank you very much for your good work! Now we're waiting for JPOX 1.1.1 (you know why... )Just a small request: Wouldn't now be the perfect time to put the JPOX-DTDs where they belong? (http://www.jpox.org/dtd/jpoxtypes_1_0.dtd & http://www.jpox.org/dtd/datastoremappings_1_0.dtd) |
||
|
|
Expert UK Joined: Mar 13, 2004 Post Count: 5376 Status: Offline |
Now we're waiting for JPOX 1.1.1 (you know why... )You mean Column.getTypeInfo() ? that I put in CVS 2 houra ago ? Just a small request: Wouldn't now be the perfect time to put the JPOX-DTDs where they belong? Check your links ... ---------------------------------------- -Andy ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Newbie Joined: Jan 4, 2006 Post Count: 15 Status: Offline |
You guys have been awesome with this project. The excellent documentation, prompt responses on the forums, and the high quality implementation you've put out has made my life a hell of a lot easier than it would have been. I with the company i work for got this up and running pronto. And with VERY favorable results to this point. You guys should be commended and are first rate. I will be upgrading to the final version in the first post implementation install our company puts in after our initial launch of our product in a couple weeks. Once again, a huge thanks and congrats on YOUR milestone. |
||
|
|
Advanced Member Switzerland Joined: Dec 20, 2004 Post Count: 102 Status: Offline |
Now we're waiting for JPOX 1.1.1 (you know why... )You mean Column.getTypeInfo() ? that I put in CVS 2 houra ago ? Just a small request: Wouldn't now be the perfect time to put the JPOX-DTDs where they belong? Check your links ... Great, thank you very much...! ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Current timezone is GMT Sep 3, 2010 4:41:04 PM |